“Some legal scholars maintain that the language in Article II of the Constitution prevents holding a presidential election again, thus putting it beyond the power of the courts to order a re-vote, as they have occasionally done for other offices. Julia Azari, an associate politics professor at Marquette University, took both questions on in a piece for 538 earlier this summer. The harder-to-answer questions are a) how she would go about challenging the election and b) what the prospects for such a challenge actually working might be. Given all of that, it’s logical to conclude Clinton knew what she was doing here. I’m not going to just go slowly and quietly into that good night.” Clinton floated the idea of formally contesting the election after she said this about how she envisions her role in the party going forward: “I expect to be really active, and my voice, I’m going to keep out there. “Right now Bob Mueller and several congressional committees are investigating to what extent the Russians impacted our election and who exactly helped them do so.”Īnd, context matters too. “I would hope anyone in America concerned about the integrity of our democracy would feel the same way if we got there. Glen Caplin, a spokesman for Clinton, said after the interview aired that the former secretary of state “has said repeatedly the results of the election are over but we have to learn what happened.” She doesn’t really do that sort of thing. Knowing what we know of Clinton, it seems unlikely to me that she simply spoke off the cuff here, that this was just an unconsidered remark. I’ve paid close attention to what Clinton’s been saying since she lost the election and I have never heard her broach the possibility of a formal challenge of the results. The 2016 Democratic nominee, who won the popular vote by nearly 3 million votes, is expressly leaving open the possibility that she would pursue legal action to invalidate the last presidential election. Gross : I want to get back to the question, would you completely rule out questioning the legitimacy of this election if we learn that the Russian interference in the election is even deeper than we know now? Here’s the full text of the back-and-forth, courtesy of CNN’s Dan Merica: She’s suggested he is a misogynist and said repeatedly that she fears for the country with Trump in charge.īut in an interview Monday with NPR’s Terry Gross, Clinton raised that critique up a notch – not only questioning the legitimacy of Trump’s presidency but refusing to rule out the possibility of contesting the results if Russian collusion is proven by special counsel Bob Mueller. In interviews over the last week surrounding the release of her 2016 memoir “What Happened,” Hillary Clinton has been hugely critical of President Donald Trump.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |